- College under fire after showing two good-looking students hooking up in library in video to recruit new undergraduates
- Educator pleads guilty to sex assault in YouTube case
- Fifty Shades of Control Freak: In her £1,500-a-night Hollywood villa, how E.L. James has all-encompassing final approval over film's sex scenes, actors and even the costumes
- Are you calling me a liar, Mr Miliband? You know I heard you say 'economy will fall off a cliff' fumes ex-Mayor's partner... so be a man and own up to it
- Controversial new website allows you to give COPS restaurant-style reviews and star ratings in the wake of police brutality cases
- Two men chain up and abandon dog Courtney outside Detroit Wal-Mart
- Armed forces failing to attract recruits despite MoD spending £30M on TV adverts
- Selfridges to stock gender neutral fashion ranges for men AND women
- Pope Francis urges people to put away their iPhones
- Spanish police arrest four Islamist militants over Charlie Hebdo-style attack
'Pregnant Man' Files for Divorce, Was He Really Married?
The “pregnant man” may soon be a male single mother.
Thomas Beatie, a transgender man who bore three children, is filing for divorce from his wife Nancy, WPTV reported.
But a judge is questioning whether their marriage was legally valid in the first place. Beatie is hoping it is, even though it’d be cheaper for him if it wasn’t.
He was born as a woman in Hawaii and had a sex change before getting married in 2003, though he still has female reproductive organs.
He bore three of the couple’s children because his wife was infertile, and made headlines when photos of him with a beard and a pregnant belly were made public.
Hawaii recognizes Beatie, 37, as a man. But Arizona, where he lives now, does not because he still had female organs when he wed Nancy. The state does not allow same-sex marriage.
Thomas Beatie, known nationally as the ‘pregnant man,’ and his wife Nancy are filing for divorce, but Arizona, where they live, doesn’t considered them married in the first place.
“Hawaii said okay, that it's a valid marriage,” said his attorney, David Michael Cantor. “Who is Arizona to say, well, we're going to ignore one of the other 49 states and say this not a valid marriage?"
Cantor admitted that the case is “new territory” for Arizona. He is fighting to have the marriage recognized, even though it makes the divorce more complicated – and costlier for his client.
"If his marriage isn't validated, he doesn't have to pay spousal maintenance, he actually does better,” he explained. “But Thomas doesn't want that."
Instead, Cantor said, the case is about “Thomas' validation. It's a valid marriage, he's a male, he's a valid person."