- WorldViews: Listen: ‘Jihadi John’ complains about questions from British intelligence services
- Swimwear model who wanted Kylie Jenner's pout tries SUCKING into hairspray lid
- Cyclist's essential or damp squib? £99 'umbrella' for bikes claims to keep you dry in rain, gales and snow storms
- High school teacher faces suspension for calling Muslim student, 14, 'rag-head Taliban'
- The strangest items confiscated by the TSA
- Islamic extremist accused of American blogger's bloody murder appears in court - as US prepares to send FBI team to Bangladesh
- 'They wouldn't know fine dining if it slapped them in their ugly faces': Bride-to-be stunned by restaurant's angry response to online review describing her hen party as 'chavs' and 'peasants'
- Two teachers who 'had boozy beach party with five male students' now charged with having sex with the teens and giving them COCAINE
- Baby bawls along with his dad as he mimics crying before stopping when he stops
- Shop forced to shut because customers were put off by sound of sex in swingers club upstairs
Mitt Romney's Welfare Claims Wrong
More from Politics
- Donald Trump Still Doesn't Believe Obama's Birth Certificate Is Real
- Dr. Ben Carson Supporters Gear Up For A Presidential Campaign
- Gov. Scott Walker Budget Deletes College Rape Reporting Requirements
- Pete Sessions: Obama Accountable For Murders 'Every Day' By Undocumented Immigrants
- Radio Host Laura Ingraham Takes Aim At Jeb Bush And His Wife At CPAC
Washington -- Welfare reform, which added a work requirement tied to welfare benefits, is often cited as a major bipartisan political success of President Bill Clinton's second term.
So the idea of the next Democratic president, Barack Obama, taking the work requirement off the table is political dynamite.
Apparently, the Romney campaign believes it is.
A Romney campaign ad titled "Welfare Reform," which came out earlier in August, says that's just what Obama did.
"On July 12, President Obama quietly ended the work requirement, gutting welfare reform. One of the most respected newspapers in the country called it 'nuts,' " the ad says.
"Under Obama's plan, you wouldn't have to work and you wouldn't have to train for a job," the ad continues. "They just send you your welfare check. And welfare to work goes back to being plain old welfare ..."
But the Obama campaign calls Romney's ad "nuts."
CNN's Fact-check agrees.
"Every single person here who's looked at it says it's patently false," Obama said a news conference on Monday.
So where did the notion of a major welfare reform overhaul come from?
Where it didn't come from is Washington but rather from Utah, Nevada, California, Connecticut and Minnesota.
These states, some with Republican governors, asked the federal government for more flexibility in how they hand out welfare dollars. Their purpose was to spend less time on federal paperwork and more time experimenting with ways to connect welfare recipients with jobs.
The Obama administration cooperated, granting waivers to some states from some of the existing rules.
The waivers gave "those states some flexibility in how they manage their welfare rolls as long as it produced 20% increases in the number of people getting work."
In some small way, the waivers might change precisely how work is calculated but the essential goal of pushing welfare recipients to work -- something both Democrats and Republicans agreed to in the 1990s -- remains the same.